I Spit on Your Grave (2010)

3.0 Overall Score
Story: 3/10
Acting: 5/10
Visuals: 3/10

Better acting for the most part than the original

Feels more gratuitous

Movie Info

Movie Name:  I Spit on Your Grave

Studio:  Cine Tel Films

Genre(s):  Horror

Release Date(s):  May 1, 2010 (Texas Frightmare Weekend)/October 8, 2010 (US)

MPAA Rating:  R


Somehow I don’t think this part of his sheriff election campaign

Jennifer Hill (Sarah Butler) is a writer travelling to a remote cabin in the woods to work on her novel in peace and quiet.  When she catches the eye of a group of local men (Rodney Eastman, Daniel Franzese, Jeff Branson, Andrew Howard, Chad Lindberg), Jennifer becomes the victim of a violent rape.  Left for dead, Jennifer comes back with a vengeance and makes those who caused her pain pay for what they did.

Directed by Steven R. Monroe, I Spit on Your Grave is a remake of the controversial 1978 film originally titled Day of the Woman then retitled I Spit on Your Grave.  The movie had ratings challenges and an unrated version of the film is readily available.  The movie was met with mostly negative reaction and a low box-office draw.


Left 4 Dead…without zombies

The original I Spit on Your Grave was pretty gratuitous, but effective.  This film seems less so and it is almost impossible not to compare the two films.  Both films are essentially grindhouse style films, but this version of the film is much cleaner than the original.  The quality of actor (for the most part) has gone up in 2010 version, but that doesn’t mean the movie is better.

The original I Spit on Your Grave had that classy looking low-budget thing going for it.  Despite the horrible content and sketchy acting, the movie looked great.  Here the movie looks technically clean, but it loses the edginess of the first film because it is too clean.  The movie looks Hollywood and doesn’t look and feel as violent and violating as the first film.


I can see clearly now!

The rape in this movie is bad, but it seems toned down from the original rape.  Another problem stemming from this movie is an attempt to make more rounded assailants.  Part of the redeeming quality of the first movie is that the movie is about Jennifer’s attempt to cope with what happened to her (be it very unrealistic).  After the rape, you don’t see what happened to her and you don’t see her coming back from the horrific attack…here you see how the guys go about their everyday life.  It takes the focus off the victim and weakens the film.


I’ll make you scream!

Jennifer’s assaults on her assailants are much more “fitting” and less provocative.  A big complaint (justly) about the first film is that rape victim wouldn’t put herself in a situation where she could be victimized again or use sexuality to woo her attackers.  Here Jennifer is more in control, and uses the men’s sins against them…I get the guy likes to watch, so he gets his eyes picked out, and that he man who talks about her teeth gets his teeth pulled, but it just wasn’t as cringe-worthy as the original kills (but better than the boat scene for the original’s last two victims).

I Spit on Your Grave’s remake really isn’t worth it, but is often available with the original.  This makes for a fun compare and contrast and to see how horror have evolved or stayed the same in the thirty years that separated the films.  If you have it, check it out, but if you don’t, don’t bother seeking it out.

Related Links:

I Spit on Your Grave (1978)


Author: JPRoscoe View all posts by
Follow me on Twitter @JPRoscoe76! Loves all things pop-culture especially if it has a bit of a counter-culture twist. Plays video games (basically from the start when a neighbor brought home an Atari 2600), comic loving (for almost 30 years), and a true critic of movies. Enjoys the art house but also isn't afraid to let in one or two popular movies at the same time.

Leave A Response